1. Sophisticated Investors (S.I.)
1.1.-DEEMED PEOPLE WHO EARN $250,000 pa or MORE……OR WHO HAVE ASSETS OF $2.5 MILLION
THESE MAY INCLUDE :
JUDGES AND MAGISTRATES - SENIOR PARTNERS OF LAW FIRMS - RETIREES
POLTICIANS - SENIOR PARTNERS OF ACCOUNTING FIRMS - SENIOR EXECUTIVES OF LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL PARLIAMENT
LISTED COMPANY DIRECTORS - PARTNERS OF BROKERAGE FIRMS
SMALL COMPANY DIRECTORS
1.2.-Many are too busy in their everyday lives of their chosen fields of work to pursue issues that may have affected their return on their investment.
1.3-They may also belong to the same clubs and organizations and are members of the same community who are embarrassed to be singled out.
1.4.Sophisticated Investors make up around 16 % of Australians ( AFR 16/01/24)
Please add further examples that you may have experienced relating to the above by clicking on the link and providing the investment and/or company.
2. Information Memorandum (I.M.)
Here are some examples:
2.1.-did your I.M. attempt to disqualify themselves from all responsibilities for what was contained in the I.M. information supplied, ASIC, needs to investigate this, why have a I.M.?
2.2.-did the IM offered as an Equity investment?
Cambridge Dictionary “"Equity -the situation in which everyone is treated fairly according to their needs and no group of people is given special treatment “
2.3.-did your I.M. talk about Securities?
2.4.-did they deliver on their promised ROI?
2.5.-did they deliver on their promised IRR?
2.6.-did they, as per the EQUITY INVESTMENT requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 perform their duties accordingly?
2.7.-was the I.M. confusing and complicated in its wording?
2.8.- was it a loan or a debt investment?
2.9.- were management fees disclosed?
2.10-if notes are issued, voting rights are attached to those notes. ASIC approval needs to have to be obtained, when voting rights are withdrawn.
2.11.-if share and note certificates are issued by a company that one invested in initially, re-issuing them through another company during term of the investment, requires that a notification be issued to the initial share and noteholders investing.
2.12.-Were S.I. ever informed of what surpluses that occurred as per the I.M.?
2.13.-I.M. saying the funds were for the BUYING of the land = EQUITY
2.14.-I.M. mentions “return to investors “-reads and means the participation in the profits = EQUITY
2.15.-I.M. for the EQUITY INVESTMENT mentions AUDITED did the S.I. ever receive audited results during the term of the investment or on its completion?
2.16.-I.M. wording and meaning of words used:
Purchasing of land / Property
Securities
Investment/Investors
Development and sale
Returns
Shares and Notes
Dividends
Profit Share
Gross earnings share
Budget
Audited figures
All the above words above were used in the Information Memorandum on one investment, some over 25 times, this strongly points to an EQUITY INVESTMENT in a accountant’s mind.
2.17.-The Executive Summary provided with an Equity investment opportunity from a Property Syndicate (P.S.)- Offered after the capital repayment and a GROSS of 15% p.a. (per Annum) this GROSS return was also mentioned in the I.M. of the same investment -but the Gross return, final payment was not received and needs to be investigated as to why not?
2.18.1.-Was the S.I. made aware that certain type of shares (B Class, Ord, Preference shares ……), were issued to Related Parties of the directors of the P.S.
2.18.2.-These” related party” shares were issued by the investment company created that the S.I. had equity in, they were issued just before the I.M. was released or during the course of the I.M. being released.
2.18.3.-Was the S.I. aware that these” related party“shares were not mentioned in the I.M.
2.18.4.-Was the S.I. made aware of what “rights” were attached to these shares.
2.18.5.-There are 10 other P.S. COMPANIES that an investor (S.I.) invested in, where "related parties” have now have been identified and were issued different “class” shares but these were not mentioned in the I.M.
2.18.6.-Was the S.I. aware that these shares transferred, sold, or whatever rights were attached, to the P.S. main company before the project was fully completed and the S.I. received their “payout“in some cases.
2.18.7.-The above related party shares were Bought/absorbed or whatever other rights attached to the shares, 2 years (approx.) before the final payout. The next investment summary of this particular equity investment suddenly reports a 26% decrease in the expected ROI?
2.18.8.-In one S.I. investment 12 Ord shares 12 redeemable preference shares were issued to two investing companies this EXACTLY mirrored the shares that were issued to the Directors “related party “companies of the P.S. (not disclosed in the I.M.)
The question is :-
-did these 2 companies read one of the two Company constitutions!! and discover 12 Redeem shares ,12 Ord shares ,on the ASIC Info and demand the same ,rights / dividends that the “related party” company’s enjoyed ?
- did the 2 Companies and the P.S. ‘‘related party’’ receive a better payout and dividend at the expense of the return promised to the S.I. (Read 3.6. and 3.7.)
2.19. -The Directors in one case say they” own “ the company that the S.I. has equity in , no details were given of this ownership in the I.M .Also clearly a case of a Conflict of Interest
2.20. -The Companies Constitution -Corporations Act 2001 -4.1c-Chapter5c -did the P.S. comply with the issuing of notes ???
2.21. - Did the P.S. make the Companies constitution readily available, were there two different Constitutions. One at the ASIC registered office/accountants, and one at P.S. head office for viewing??
2.22.-When making queries as to certain criteria had not been met as per the I.M. such as undisclosed share issues ,normal investment and returns that have not been achieved, profit distribution , the P.S. Company, Its appointed employees and its Directors have failed to act or even acknowledge the e mails and registered letters
2.23.The I.M. in one case, it specifically mentioned that audit funds had been removed/paid so as the S.I. would receive a final audit .Yet the P.S. will not or cannot give these audited financial results to the S.I. even though they have been told that the I.M. of the P.S stated this. These results have salient information on the investment for the S.I.
2.24. Best Legal Definition of Fraud: - Fraud is the voluntary transfer of something of value by deceit.
2.25. The P.S executive summary:- uses the term pari -passu to ALL the equity holders in the investment, there were 3 mentioned, But the main company that the S.I. and investors were involved were treated as lenders to the project in the final payout This change in the investment was made without consultation, meetings, and voting on the issue.
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the company and the investment you were involved in.
3. Background to many of these Directors and Major Shareholders of These Property Syndicates
3.1.They are seen as successful and respectable businessmen or women
3.2.-Many live in the affluent suburbs of W.A. and belong to local Golf Clubs, Yacht Clubs, Aero and other exclusive Clubs in Perth
3.3.-Their status and reputation give the Sophisticated and ordinary investor a sense of trust, comfort and security
3.4.-Their perceived public notoriety as being successful
3.5.- As an S.I. do you feel embarrassed to question anything to do with your own dissatisfaction, should there be any, due to you being ostracized or isolated in their community or club for raising your legitimate concerns
3.6. -They belong or advise major institutions such as A.C.I.D. , A.I.M, giving them further credibility in the S.I. eyes.
3.7. Did the P.S. main Company have an “internal capital pool trust “that issued redeemable preference shares to the Directors, which were used to invest in S.I. ventures, maybe these were not disclosed in the I.M. of new ventures!!
3.8. The Redeemable shares owned/issued by the directors in the "internal capital pool trust “_ Did they receive dividends from the S.I. Investment Companies and what other rights were attached to those redeemable shares??
3.9.In a 2- 3-month period or less, this “internal capital pool trust” of a P.S. , earned more than $750,000
3.10 P.S. Directors has been exposed to having set up two or more companies with similar Company names , in one case leaving out a letter in the main company name spelling so if any S.I.does not constantly refer back to ASIC ACN numbers you may be mislead on any agreements documentation or payments
3.11 P.S . Directors have been exposed or worked for large bankruptcy/liquidating firm in Australia. The question is , was a model/learnings derived from the inside Knowlege they obtained from the dubious structuring of some of the company’s that were liquidated ?? A W.A. firm, Irongate Pty Ltd - DESCIBED AS A ROGUE DEVELOPER could be a prime example .
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
4. Building Companies
4.1.Were you aware that many of the building companies who were awarded the contract may have paid the holding company of the P.S. a fee or % for having been awarded the contract (lawyers that work in this field, when being alerted to the above said: - it is quite a common practice!!! Freudian slip !!!). This is not mentioned in the I.M. in the many cases that we have investigated.
4.2.-In one of the investments a building company had equity in the S.I. investment (not disclosed in the I.M.) the building company then becomes the builder of the project -CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
5. A.S.I.C. Governance & Regulation
5.1.-Large numbers of individual companies are created and then on the completion of a project, de-registered. This often occurs just before the date of A.S.I.C.’s annual review of the company and its levying of the annual fee.
5.2.-The question is: If the company has completed its function and paid all its creditors and the A.T.O. why not continue to use it again and again like most other businesses do?
5.3. One P.S. has had over 200 companies created, over 100 have been deregistered.
5.4.A S.I. that invested in over 20 of these companies, only 1 can be identified as to have been reused (ACN No) by the P.S.
5.5.-The reason for de registering could be related to how difficult the process is to have the company re-instated which creates further difficulty when seeking information from the company and investigating its actions.
5.6.-Why are in some cases the shareholder registration records are given to a Independent Custodian entity?
5.7.-Why are the Noteholders records, in most cases, given to a Independent Custodian entity?
5.8.-Independent Custodian Companys were created and for companies that were trading shares daily (i.e. 100’s of 1000s of shares) not for Companys that issued a fix number of shares and notes per investment!!
5.9.-If the P.S. changed the issuing of shares and notes, it should have been communicated with the initial Equity holders.
5.10.-If the P.S. appointed itself as the Manager of the project - could this be viewed as a Conflict of Interest
- the shareholders and noteholders should be able to view the management agreement of the P.S.
- read (2.1. and 2.2.)
5.11.-P.S. During the course of the Equity without notification or consulting with the shareholders and note holders, changed the name, and by doing this they thought they could change the entire nature of the investment to a development investment.
5.12.-P.S. Did not go through the correct procedures, required, when winding up and deregistering a company
5.13.- There is movement by ASIC as per - West Australian 19th Jan 2024 - to deal with “these white collared crooks”.
5.14.-Insider Trading ASIC raid -Angela Snowden -Journalist-The Australian - June 3rd 2024
5.15.-Currently A.S.I.C. is engaged in a number of- Corporate governance enforcement- legal cases ( Summary of Corporate Governance Enforcement Outcomes Table 5. ASIC Reports)
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
6. A.C.C.C.
6.1.- Misleading and deceptive conduct. Do you believe that your I.M. could have been misleading?
6.2. Brochures produced by P.S. make claims that they have a” Perfect track record of -capital and projected interest.”
6.3. Were all the qualifications and associations with different organizations genuine?
6.4. Selling the investment as a equity investment /then illegally turning the S.I. investment into a Lender to the project there are over 24 Sophisticated Investors/Investors effected by this.
6.5.Why in the case of inspecting the corporate register, there happened to be two Company Constitutions (maybe different?) - this was unable to be verified as a 2nd attempt to read them was denied by accounting firm that held the corporate register and required correspondence. read2.21., 5.1,5.4-maybe one of Company Constitutions was misleading and deceptive.
6.6. Australian Competition and Consumer Law 2010 (Comm) s.18 - misleading and deceptive for companies
6.7.The Fair Trading Amendment (Australian consumer Law) Act 2010 in NSW applies to individuals.
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
7. Australian Securities mentioned in I.M. by P.S.
7.1. They consistently talk about securities in one I.M. identified .“Definition- Equity securities give an ownership interest in the underlying entity.”
7.2. Were they a members of the -Association of Australian Stockbrokers
7.3.Were they a member of Australian Institute of Management (A.I.M)
7.4. Were they members of Australian Institute of Company Directors (A.I.C.D.)
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
8. Overpayment Of P.S. Stated Fee For Project Management By The Property Syndicate Managers/Directors
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
9. Accounting Firms Acting for P.S. (property syndicates)
9.1.-Acting on behalf of the P.S. as the registered office of the S.I. Investment Co and the I.M. wording saying that P.S. head office was the registered office of the P.S. ??
9.2.-Becoming officers of the companies involved in P.S.
9.3.-Company registers not being kept up to date as per ASIC requirements
Under the Australian Corporations Act 2001, companies are required to maintain certain records and comply with financial reporting and auditing requirements. Here are some key points:
Financial Records: Section 286 of the Corporations Act mandates that companies keep financial records for at least seven years after the transactions covered by those records are complete1. These records should include details of financial transactions, assets, liabilities, income, and expenses.
Financial Reporting and Audit: The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) oversees compliance with financial reporting and auditing requirements for entities subject to the Corporations Act. Companies must prepare financial statements, including profit and loss statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements. Additionally, they must undergo an annual audit by an independent auditor if they meet certain criteria2.
9.4.-ASIC Company Registers , not knowing, or pretending not to know the law about access to the public and why the Company Register have to be available during the hours specified by ASIC
ASIC - "Accessing Company information.”- Anyone has a right to inspect a copy of a company’s share register
Under the Corporations Act 2001 in Australia, companies are required to maintain registers, including a register of shareholders. These registers must be kept at one of the following locations:
The company’s registered office within the jurisdiction.
The company’s principal place of business in the jurisdiction.
A designated place (whether on the company’s premises or elsewhere) where the work of maintaining the register is done12.
9.5.- Accounting firm associated with (P.S.)did not comply with ASIC requirement of having the Company’s Register kept on the premises at all times
-Read point( 5 )above in conjunction with this, as some of the points maybe relevant
9.5.-S.I. When Corresponding with "Officers”/Secretary’s of the P.S. Companys, with query’s, they are ignored
9.6.- If some of the partners of the accounting firm were, made officers of the company’s related to the S.I .Company investments and wouldn’t this be a major conflict of interest ???And does it make all the partners liable should there be any misrepresentation be it in the I.M. or in the financials.
9.7 De registering of S.I. investment companies ,totally disregarding the Corporations Act 2001 , which requires “Unanimous decision by all shareholders”
9.8 There is almost a very obvious ,frantic attempt by one accounting firm in 2023 to de register a number of companies related to well known promoter of property syndicate investments . Some of these were issued B class Shares and what rights that were attached to them were never disclosed. According to Corporations Act 2001 (they should have limited voting rights and lower dividend priority )
9.10 many Accounting firms do not follow the procedures set out by the Australian Corporations Act 2001of removing a Shareholder . They just submit papers to ASIC “Ticking the required boxes “ without the Knowledge of the shareholder.
Agreement with Shareholder: First, ensure you have an agreement with the shareholder to remove or transfer their shares.
Key Documents:
Record of Share Sale: If the shares are sold, create a formal record of the transaction. Include details like the date of sale, seller’s and purchaser’s information, shares sold, and the total price paid.
Minutes of Meeting and Resolution: Hold a meeting to formally record the shareholder’s removal. Draft minutes that outline the terms of their removal.
9.11 All members (shareholders) of the company agree to the de-registration.
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
10. Overseas Investors
10.1.Did your investment have a number of overseas investors which is disproportionate to the total onshore shareholders?
10.2. The authorities need to investigate who these investors/companies are and if they could have links with Australian citizens
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
11. Legal Case History That Could Relate to any of the Points Above and/or used with the Above Possible Class Action?
Please share with us any case history that could be quoted within the above 9 points for P.S. and S.I.
11.1.-Australian Securities Exchange prosecuted- Citation Resources- (Director - Peter Landau)
11.2.-ASIC -Naseeruddin prosecution
11.3. Section 192E of Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Referral from ASIC - Ralan Property group Mr. O’ Dwyer- 4 years Jail (The Australian 3/02/24 )
11.4. Read 5.13. Search ASIC Website for further information.
11.5.ASIC permanently Bans Financial services Advisor 13th February 2024
11.6.ASIC fines ASX for 8417 breaches of the rules A.F.R. 7th March 2024
11.7.ASIC bans Diamond Joe Gutnick for 4 years as a director 9thMarch 2024 A.F.R.
11.8.ASIC Cameron Kerr Waugh-9 months jail for insider trading ,profit made $57000 West Australian 27/03/024
11.9.ASIC Jan Cameron -Katmandu fame =Fined 29/03/24 for non disclosure of shareholding
11.10.A subscriber to this site has informed us of a Director of a 1980 Firm who, through insider trading, made over $1,000,000 reported in “"Herd on the terrace” West Australian -( over $10,000,000 today)but was never prosecuted. But the law firm informed us that it is a criminal offence
and could be resurrected by ASIC (more info to come )
11.11. Read 6.5 and 6.6 above.
11.12. Best Legal Definition of Fraud: - Fraud is the voluntary transfer of something of value by deceit.
Please add the case history that you have experienced by clicking on this link.
12. Public Interest/Government Agencies/A.F.C.A.
12.1.-Government Agencies need to be alerted to the Property Syndicates (P.S.) that could be skirting the law or sailing very close to the law (Grey areas as referred to by ASIC Chairman 10/1/24. Australian Financial Review).
12.2.-The public needs to be protected from the possibility of dishonest practices by the Property Syndicates (P.S.)
12.3. When the S.I. is presented with a equity investment in the Information Memorandum. The Invesment of the P.S. becomes a mere conduit of money, without notification from the manager and the P.S. (same Directors) to the S.I. effectively is a lender.
12.4.- Refer to 15.1 below
12.5. Australian Financial Complaints Authority (A.F.C.A.) has been recommended as a government division that may be alerted to these practices of Property Syndicates.
12.6 All /most of these Property Syndicates require a Financial Services License if their have been breaches they need to be outlined to ASIC
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
13. Qualifications of Directors
13.1.-Brings into play some of these directors and whether they hold the degrees and qualifications, that they portray themselves as having.
13.2. This begs the question that- Institutions that issue the qualifications and /or that the qualified members have a true understanding of the Accounting Profession, Legal requirements and the Corporations Act 2001.
13.3. With the qualifications and the experience that the Directors of one P.S. have between them in the building trade, the roofing trade ,Property insolvency firms , lawyers and accounting firms ,family trust companies they would be acutely aware of their director’s responsibility’s under the Corporations Law 2001 of Australia
13.4 . CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND Members -Wellington 2023 -You have to hold a provisional membership for 8 Years - and then complete the CA program and then 3 years of PRACTICAL experience to be able to call or use the CA SYMBOL against your name on a C.V. or your office of practice and on your marketing material (You must also hold a Certificate of Public Practice)
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
14. Conflicts of Interest by Property Syndicates (P.S.)
14.1.-Investors are issued shares and notes in a Investment company (A) , which in turn is “owned”? by the directors of the Property Syndicate Company (P.S) this Property Syndicate (P.S) to is “owned “by the same directors and it in turn becomes the“manager "of the S.I. investment and interest in that company(A)- a clear Conflict of Interest
14.2.-The Building Company appointed for the project is also an investor in Company (A)and the appointed developer. -A clear Conflict of Interest
14.3. Also read, -2.19.- 4.2. above
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
15. Sophisticated Investors Require an Exit Strategy from the P.S.
15.1. - AFR (Australian Financial Review)16th Jan 2024, As per article there is a public concern of non-listed property syndicates not having in their I.M. a proper Exit Strategy for S.I. who want to remove their funds before the project is completed, due to unforeseen circumstances.
15.2. A S.I. investor requested an exit of all the investments due to an altercation with a senior manager about the direction /management of the P.S investments. This was denied or not even followed up on by the P.S. .The S.I. discovered that some years later a another S.I.,Investor was granted 3 to 4 ways of exiting their portfolio
-Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
16. Structure of Property Syndicates (P.S.) & Use of Family Trusts
16.1. A family trust normally has a company who is the trustee for the family trust and its beneficiaries that are named in the trust deed
16.2. Australian Family trusts ,which are completely legal if managed and set up in the correct way
can name as the beneficiaries all next of kin ranging from grandparents ,all their siblings and spouses and children , Directors and owners of the income stream that they generate, their spouses and all their children ,plus bucket companies or other trusts .
16.3. Family trust can and are used for the distribution of profits ,dividends and capital gains basically to lessen the tax burden of a individual or the named beneficiaries in the trust.
16.4. These trusts and their named beneficiaries is also a way to ‘‘hide’’ who are the real shareholders behind some companies
16.5.The trustee company’s are rapidly been de registered with ASIC as are some of beneficiary company’s of these Trustee company’s with the same shareholders and directors has headed down exactly the same route of deregistration ,why ?????(according to the Corporations Act 2001 should have 75% of the shareholders approval )
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
17. Interesting Comments & Observations of Directors & Officers of the Companies of P.S.
-STEP-1-THE DIRECTORS OF A CERTAIN (P.S.) ARE NOW ADOPTING THE AGE-OLD STRATEGY OF DEMONIZING AND TRYING TO OSTRACIZE CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE HAD A POOR EXPERIANCES WITH A CERTAIN (P.S.)
-STEP-2- Now they P.S directors and shareholders are arming their wife or partner with the lopsided criticism/view of the why these individuals (S.I) are completely evil and are only of ill intent, the wives or partners then spread this viewpoint at the tennis club, bridge club, gym club, etc. to further ostracize the individuals and their families and some cases their friends
-STEP- 3 - Start to influence extremely well-connected people in the Government and use their sphere of influence and levers of power.
-STEP-4-Contacting the Government departments that oversee these Property Syndicates laws and regulations and trying to, retrospectively, correct their glaring mistakes and errors to prevent prosecution and a public led class action.
-"You measure your success by the venom of your enemies"- Winston Churchill
-It takes a lifetime to build a reputation, trust and respect but it only takes a very short period of time to lose it all.
-A quote that is have said to be used by a P.S. Director on leaving one set of employers -” You will never be rich …(Mr….such and such )… as you are far to honest “
-Read Section 3 of this Document
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
17. Interesting Comments & Observations of Directors & Officers of the Companies of P.S.
-STEP-1-THE DIRECTORS OF A CERTAIN (P.S.) ARE NOW ADOPTING THE AGE-OLD STRATEGY OF DEMONIZING AND TRYING TO OSTRACIZE CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE HAD A POOR EXPERIANCES WITH A CERTAIN (P.S.)
-STEP-2- Now they P.S directors and shareholders are arming their wife or partner with the lopsided criticism/view of the why these individuals (S.I) are completely evil and are only of ill intent, the wives or partners then spread this viewpoint at the tennis club, bridge club, gym club, etc. to further ostracize the individuals and their families and some cases their friends
-STEP- 3 - Start to influence extremely well-connected people in the Government and use their sphere of influence and levers of power.
-STEP-4-Contacting the Government departments that oversee these Property Syndicates laws and regulations and trying to, retrospectively, correct their glaring mistakes and errors to prevent prosecution and a public led class action.
-"You measure your success by the venom of your enemies"- Winston Churchill
-It takes a lifetime to build a reputation, trust and respect but it only takes a very short period of time to lose it all.
-A quote that is have said to be used by a P.S. Director on leaving one set of employers -” You will never be rich …(Mr….such and such )… as you are far to honest “
-Read Section 3 of this Document
Please add further examples that you have experienced by clicking on this link and name the Investment and Company
CLASS ACTION MAY BE INSTITUTED
We believe the actions of P.S. not meeting their duties should be exposed to the courts. We believe there is a good chance we could be successful based on expert advice we have received, to assist in halting this sort of behavior regularly committed against sophisticated investors and other investors. We invite you to register your interest. We can get back to you regarding appointing solicitors and K.C.’s once we have collated all the information.
Corporations Act 2001. Maximum Penalty of 5 Years in Jail or 200 penalty units fine under Section 184 alone.
Other Areas of Possible Prosecution and Interest under the Corporations Act 2001:
Section 5.3, 5.4, 7,173,174, 180-184, 461, 588 & 597.
IF WE ARE SUCCESSFUL IN EXPOSING AND GETTING A JUDGEMENT AND BEING AWARDED OUR RIGHTFUL RETURNS BY THE COURT, THERE ARE FURTHER PROSECUTIONS THAT COULD TAKE PLACE RELATING TO THE DIRECTORS, COMPANY SECRETARIES AND OFFICERS WHO WERE INVOLVED WITH THESE COMPANIES DURING THEIR TENURE.
REGISTER YOUR POSSIBLE INTEREST IN A CLASS ACTION BELOW
SEE THE INPUT RESPONSE OF OVER 1020 PEOPLE SO FAR (WHO HAVE REGISTERED TO THE SITE) AFFECTED BY POSSIBLE DECEPTIVE TACTICS FROM PROPERTY SYNDICATES and OVER 1700 Page Views.
Information Memorandum (I.M.)
Property Syndicates (P.S.)
Sophisticated Investors (S.I.)
